On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 10:33 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > + .running = ATOMIC_INIT(0), \
> > + atomic_t running;
> > + atomic_set(&sig->cputimer.running, 1);
> > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static inline bool cputimer_running(struct task_struct
> > *tsk)
> > + if (!atomic_read(&cputimer->running))
> > + if (!atomic_read(&cputimer->running)) {
> > + atomic_set(&cputimer->running, 1);
> > + if (atomic_read(&tsk->signal->cputimer.running))
> > + atomic_set(&cputimer->running, 0);
> > + if (atomic_read(&sig->cputimer.running)) {
> > + if (atomic_read(&tsk->signal->cputimer.running))
>
> That doesn't really need an atomic_t.
Yeah, I was wondering about that, and made it atomic since we had:
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cputimer->lock, flags);
cputimer->running = 0;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cputimer->lock, flags);
in stop_process_timers().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
