Dear Antoine,

On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:10:09 -0800
Antoine Tenart <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some controllers (as the coming Berlin nand controller) need to enable
> an ECC clock. Add support for this clock in the pxa3xx nand driver, and
> leave it as non mandatory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> index d00ac392d1c4..2681ec4abafa 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ struct pxa3xx_nand_info {
>       struct nand_hw_control  controller;
>       struct platform_device   *pdev;
>  
> -     struct clk              *clk;
> +     struct clk              *clk, *ecc_clk;
>       void __iomem            *mmio_base;
>       unsigned long           mmio_phys;
>       struct completion       cmd_complete, dev_ready;
> @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> *pdev) 
>       spin_lock_init(&chip->controller->lock);
>       init_waitqueue_head(&chip->controller->wq);
> -     info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +     info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nfc");
>       if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) {

Do we need to fall back to unnamed clock here? Otherwise I guess it will break
other platforms.

>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get nand clock\n");
>               return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
> @@ -1617,6 +1617,13 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct
> platform_device *pdev) if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     info->ecc_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ecc");
> +     if (!IS_ERR(info->ecc_clk)) {
> +             ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->ecc_clk);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     goto fail_disable_clk;
> +     }
> +
>       if (use_dma) {
>               /*
>                * This is a dirty hack to make this driver work from
> @@ -1633,7 +1640,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> *pdev) dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>                                       "no resource defined for data
> DMA\n"); ret = -ENXIO;
> -                             goto fail_disable_clk;
> +                             goto fail_disable_ecc_clk;
>                       }
>                       info->drcmr_dat = r->start;
>  
> @@ -1642,7 +1649,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> *pdev) dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>                                       "no resource defined for cmd
> DMA\n"); ret = -ENXIO;
> -                             goto fail_disable_clk;
> +                             goto fail_disable_ecc_clk;
>                       }
>                       info->drcmr_cmd = r->start;
>               }
> @@ -1652,14 +1659,14 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct
> platform_device *pdev) if (irq < 0) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ resource defined\n");
>               ret = -ENXIO;
> -             goto fail_disable_clk;
> +             goto fail_disable_ecc_clk;
>       }
>  
>       r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>       info->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>       if (IS_ERR(info->mmio_base)) {
>               ret = PTR_ERR(info->mmio_base);
> -             goto fail_disable_clk;
> +             goto fail_disable_ecc_clk;
>       }
>       info->mmio_phys = r->start;
>  
> @@ -1668,7 +1675,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> *pdev) info->data_buff = kmalloc(info->buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (info->data_buff == NULL) {
>               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             goto fail_disable_clk;
> +             goto fail_disable_ecc_clk;
>       }
>  
>       /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */
> @@ -1687,6 +1694,9 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> *pdev) fail_free_buf:
>       free_irq(irq, info);
>       kfree(info->data_buff);
> +fail_disable_ecc_clk:
> +     if (!IS_ERR(info->ecc_clk))
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(info->ecc_clk);

we can remove the IS_ERR check to simplify this error path since commit
63589e92c2d9("clk: Ignore error and NULL pointers passed to clk_{unprepare, 
disable}()")

>  fail_disable_clk:
>       clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
>       return ret;
> @@ -1709,6 +1719,8 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev) pxa3xx_nand_free_buff(info);
>  
>       clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> +     if (!IS_ERR(info->ecc_clk))
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(info->ecc_clk);

we can remove the IS_ERR check too.

>  
>       for (cs = 0; cs < pdata->num_cs; cs++)
>               nand_release(info->host[cs]->mtd);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to