From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <[email protected]>

this patch fixes following sparse warning:

processor_thermal_device.c:188:6: warning: symbol 'proc_thermal_remove' was not 
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <[email protected]>
---
 Found this issue on linux-next (gcc  version 4.9.2,
 sparse version  0.4.5-rc1)and applies on top linux-next.

 drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c 
b/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
index 0fe5dbb..095acac 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ free_buffer:
        return ret;
 }
 
-void proc_thermal_remove(struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv)
+static void proc_thermal_remove(struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv)
 {
        sysfs_remove_group(&proc_priv->dev->kobj,
                           &power_limit_attribute_group);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to