On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 20/02/15 16:01, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
> >>> pr_debug("%s(): task ending\n", __func__);
> >>> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static void pxafb_disable_controller(struct
> >>> pxafb_info *fbi)
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_FB_PXA_SMARTPANEL
> >>> if (fbi->lccr0 & LCCR0_LCDT) {
> >>> wait_for_completion_timeout(&fbi->refresh_done,
> >>> - 200 * HZ / 1000);
> >>> + msecs_to_jiffies(200);
> >>
> >> That will not compile.
>
> > No compile warning or errors
> >
> > could you send me the compile error message and the toolchain you
> > are using - this change should not really have any noticable impact.
>
> I didn't compile it. It's missing a closing parenthesis.
>
> This is one reason I'm not very fond of cleanups to drivers that the
> patch sender cannot test... They may cause more problems than they help.
>
That was the intent of compile testing the patch but it seems
that it was not covered by the config in use - sorry for that, it was
missing the [*] PXA Smartpanel LCD support so
root@debian:~/linux-next# grep CONFIG_FB_PXA_SMARTPANEL .config
# CONFIG_FB_PXA_SMARTPANEL is not set
The motivation for the cleanup simply was code reasdability - will fix this up
and compile check with a proper config.
thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
