Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes: > On Thursday 19 February 2015 00:35:49 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:47:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > The smc91x driver tries to support multiple platforms at compile >> > time, but they are mutually exclusive at runtime, and not clearly >> > defined. >> >> I'd prefer to rework this to fix that properly. From what I remember, >> the whole SA11x0 stuff in this driver was a mess. > > I guess that's reasonable. I've looked through the driver and it seems we > did most of the multiplatform work but left a few things alone that should > have been converted a long time ago. > > Can you check if the approach below makes sense to you? > > I've verified that each machine that defines an smc91x device now sets > the correct platform data, irq flags and access width, which should be > enough to collapse all the CONFIG_ARM cases into one. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> When you're both satisfied with the smc91x patch, I can offer to test it across the pxa boards (lubbock, zylonite, and maybe mainstone). As I'm actively using the first 2, I'm interested in them being as functional as now :)
Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
