On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 15:15 +0100, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ def main():
> stdout = stdout[:-1]
>
> for gitfile in stdout.rsplit("\n"):
> - if ".git" in gitfile or "ChangeLog" in gitfile or \
> - ".log" in gitfile or os.path.isdir(gitfile):
> + if ".git" in gitfile or "ChangeLog" in gitfile or \
> + ".log" in gitfile or os.path.isdir(gitfile) or \
> + gitfile.startswith("tools/"):
Perhaps just
gitfile == "tools/perf/config/Makefile"
(but I'm unsure if that's valid python)?
> continue
> if REGEX_FILE_KCONFIG.match(gitfile):
> kconfig_files.append(gitfile)
This patch was triggered by perf changes that hit next-20150225, wasn't
it? If so, we might want to find out why the perf people need to use
their
"$(call detected,CONFIG_EXAMPLE)"
hack. Especially because that hack is also used on existing Kconfig
symbols (I spotted X86, X86_64, AUDIT, and NUMA). And the usage of both
valid Kconfig macros and faux Kconfig macros in that hack looks odd to
me.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
