On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:09 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote: > > The existing bindings intentionally avoided quoting internal registers - > > they are supposed to describe how the hardware is wired up... > > > > So how about something like "arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac"? Then the driver > > sets the bit or not, depending on the property existance? > > > Sure, I can change it to two properties called arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac > and arm,pl11x,tft-clksel. Would that be acceptable?
That would be fine by me :-) Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
