On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> Please don't. IMO it's really nice that we don't use trap gates at
> all on x86_64, and I find the conditional_sti thing much nicer than
> having to audit all of the entry code to see whether it's safe to run
> it with IRQs on.
So I'm not sure I see much difference, but I'd certainly be ok with
just moving the "conditional_sti()" up unconditionally to be the first
thing in do_device_not_available().
The point being that we still *not* just randomly enable interrupts
because we decide that the callers are wrong.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
