On 03/09/2015 08:06 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The rds_iw_add_conn function stores a large 'struct rds_sock'
I think you might have a typo here- did you mean rds_iw_update_cm_id above (which is the function that has a 'struct rds_sock rs' on the stack)? The rest of the change looks fine to me. --Sowmini
object on the stack in order to pass a pair of addresses. This happens to just fit withint the 1024 byte stack size warning limit on x86, but just exceed that limit on ARM, which gives us this warning: net/rds/iw_rdma.c:200:1: warning: the frame size of 1056 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] The warning is correct in principle, though unlikely to be related to a serious problem. As the use of this large variable is basically bogus, we can rearrange the code to not do that. Instead of passing an rds socket into rds_iw_get_device, we now just pass the two addresses that we have available in rds_iw_update_cm_id, and we change rds_iw_get_mr accordingly, to create two address structures on the stack there. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> diff --git a/net/rds/iw_rdma.c b/net/rds/iw_rdma.c index a817705ce2d0..dba8d0864f18 100644 --- a/net/rds/iw_rdma.c +++ b/net/rds/iw_rdma.c @@ -88,7 +88,9 @@ static unsigned int rds_iw_unmap_fastreg_list(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, int *unpinned); static void rds_iw_destroy_fastreg(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, struct rds_iw_mr *ibmr); -static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwdev, struct rdma_cm_id **cm_id) +static int rds_iw_get_device(struct sockaddr_in *src, struct sockaddr_in *dst, + struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwdev, + struct rdma_cm_id **cm_id) { struct rds_iw_device *iwdev; struct rds_iw_cm_id *i_cm_id; @@ -112,15 +114,15 @@ static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwd src_addr->sin_port, dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr, dst_addr->sin_port, - rs->rs_bound_addr, - rs->rs_bound_port, - rs->rs_conn_addr, - rs->rs_conn_port); + src->sin_addr.s_addr, + src->sin_port, + dst->sin_addr.s_addr, + dst->sin_port); #ifdef WORKING_TUPLE_DETECTION - if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_bound_addr && - src_addr->sin_port == rs->rs_bound_port && - dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_conn_addr && - dst_addr->sin_port == rs->rs_conn_port) { + if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == src->sin_addr.s_addr && + src_addr->sin_port == src->sin_port && + dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == dst->sin_addr.s_addr && + dst_addr->sin_port == dst->sin_port) { #else /* FIXME - needs to compare the local and remote * ipaddr/port tuple, but the ipaddr is the only @@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwd * zero'ed. It doesn't appear to be properly populated * during connection setup... */ - if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_bound_addr) { + if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == src->sin_addr.s_addr) { #endif spin_unlock_irq(&iwdev->spinlock); *rds_iwdev = iwdev; @@ -180,19 +182,13 @@ int rds_iw_update_cm_id(struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev, struct rdma_cm_id *cm_i { struct sockaddr_in *src_addr, *dst_addr; struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev_old; - struct rds_sock rs; struct rdma_cm_id *pcm_id; int rc; src_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)&cm_id->route.addr.src_addr; dst_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)&cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr; - rs.rs_bound_addr = src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr; - rs.rs_bound_port = src_addr->sin_port; - rs.rs_conn_addr = dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr; - rs.rs_conn_port = dst_addr->sin_port; - - rc = rds_iw_get_device(&rs, &rds_iwdev_old, &pcm_id); + rc = rds_iw_get_device(src_addr, dst_addr, &rds_iwdev_old, &pcm_id); if (rc) rds_iw_remove_cm_id(rds_iwdev, cm_id); @@ -598,9 +594,17 @@ void *rds_iw_get_mr(struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned long nents, struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev; struct rds_iw_mr *ibmr = NULL; struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id; + struct sockaddr_in src = { + .sin_addr.s_addr = rs->rs_bound_addr, + .sin_port = rs->rs_bound_port, + }; + struct sockaddr_in dst = { + .sin_addr.s_addr = rs->rs_conn_addr, + .sin_port = rs->rs_conn_port, + }; int ret; - ret = rds_iw_get_device(rs, &rds_iwdev, &cm_id); + ret = rds_iw_get_device(&src, &dst, &rds_iwdev, &cm_id); if (ret || !cm_id) { ret = -ENODEV; goto out; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
