> On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
> >> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed
> >> upon a generic interface so that any NIC is able to turn on or off VF
> >> multicast promiscuous mode.
> >
> > Jeff, please make sure to either respond to my comments on the V2
> > thread (or better) address them for the V3 post.
> >
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441852518152&w=2
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441867218183&w=2
>
> I agree with you that the patch descriptions should be cleaned up and
> "beefed" up for that matter.
>
> If/when I look to push his series of patches, I will make sure that your
> concerns are addressed so that we can get a accurate changelog.
I see that the patchset should have better explanation in changelog.
I will rewrite it and submit again.
Jeff, are you planning to drop the patchset from your tree?
I just concerned which tree I should create patches against for.
thanks,
Hiroshi
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
