Hi Arnaldo, On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered > already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc. > > In retrospect, the perf.data file should have kept that ordering, i.e. > have one file per mmap, that would be saved in parallel, without any of > those PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND records. > > But I have to experiment with that, leaving the existing code around to > deal with older files.
It seems like what you said is almost same as my multi-thread work. It saves data files per mmap and then merges them with an index table so that they can be processed in parallel. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
