On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:22:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Wait... It looks like it really was saving them. Of course, this is
Bah, of course. Blind me.
> IOW, in 2.5.63 and earlier, we tried to save and restore TLS state
> across signals, but we did it wrong and would corrupt it for any
> program that used arch_prctl. At that time, programs could switch
> userspace threads using signals and their TLS pointers would switch.
> In 2.5.64 and later, we broke set_thread_area users, fixed arch_prctl
That is probably non-issue as 2.5 was the devel branch anyway in the old
days. I'm not sure what the statement on breaking ABI was though then...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
