Em Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > > > Preparing for feature checks separation, moving related stuff under > > 'FEATURE*' namespace. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > Cc: Corey Ashford <[email protected]> > > Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > > So I think the various capital letter files in $(cwd) are highly > suboptimal: > > FEATURE-DUMP > PERF-CFLAGS > PERF-VERSION-FILE > > I think we should standardize on something less pushy (no shouting), > plus more standardized, more logical, more coherent names, i.e. > something like: > > .build.features.cache > .build.cflags > .build.version > > ? > > .build.features.* would be reserved to the generic feature detection > machinery. > > .build.cflags and .build.version could be used by the perf build - > hopefully exported to tools/build/ as well in the future! :-) > > That way the .gitignore could just ignore .build.* and we'd not have > to update it much.
Agreed, Jiri? > Btw., another small nit: could we please do a (git-)rename of > tools/build/feature/ to tools/build/features/? > Plural is what is used typically for generic frameworks that deal with > a set of items (features in this case) - for example we have > tools/tests/, and tools/perf/scripts/, not tools/test/ and > tools/perf/script/. This one is easy enough, will do in my next pull req. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
