On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:00:25AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
>On 24/03/15 09:13, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Hi Juri,
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:27:09AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 23/03/2015 08:55, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:25:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                  if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                          if (dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                                  /*
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                                   * Fail to find any suitable 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cpu.
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                                   * The task will never come 
>>>>>>>>>>>> back!
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                                   */
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                                  WARN_ON(1);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can this condition happen to users with a non-buggy kernel?
>>>>
>>>>> I still haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this question. Please 
>>>>> don't resend patches without clearing questions raised during review.
>>>>
>>>> So I had a look on Friday, it _should_ not happen, but it does due to a
>>>> second bug Juri is currently chasing down.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, it should not happen. It happens because hotplug operations are
>>> destructive w.r.t. cpusets. Peter, how about we move the check you put
>>> in sched_cpu_inactive() to cpuset_cpu_inactive()? This way, if we fail,
>>> we don't need to destroy/rebuild the domains.
>> 
>> I remember you mentioned that there is a bug through IRC last week, if this 
>> patch solve it?
>>
>
>It seems to fix it. With the previous check we correctly fail to turn
>off a cpu with -dl task running only the first time. After that the
>bandwidth information associated with it was gone and subsequent hotplug
>operations on the same cpu would turn it off.

Cool, thanks for your patch and efforts. ;-)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>Thanks,
>
>- Juri
>
>> Regards,
>> Wanpeng Li 
>> 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Juri
>>>
>>> >From 65e8033e05f8b70116747062d00d5a5c266699fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:47:03 +0000
>>> Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: check for available -dl bandwidth in
>>> cpuset_cpu_inactive
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/sched/core.c | 56 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> index 50927eb..3723ad0 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> @@ -5318,36 +5318,13 @@ static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block 
>>> *nfb,
>>> static int sched_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb,
>>>                                     unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>>> {
>>> -   unsigned long flags;
>>> -   long cpu = (long)hcpu;
>>> -   struct dl_bw *dl_b;
>>> -
>>>     switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
>>>     case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
>>> -           set_cpu_active(cpu, false);
>>> -
>>> -           /* explicitly allow suspend */
>>> -           if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
>>> -                   bool overflow;
>>> -                   int cpus;
>>> -
>>> -                   rcu_read_lock_sched();
>>> -                   dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
>>> -
>>> -                   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
>>> -                   cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
>>> -                   overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
>>> -                   raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
>>> -
>>> -                   rcu_read_unlock_sched();
>>> -
>>> -                   if (overflow)
>>> -                           return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
>>> -           }
>>> +           set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, false);
>>>             return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> +   default:
>>> +           return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>     }
>>> -
>>> -   return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int __init migration_init(void)
>>> @@ -7001,7 +6978,6 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_active(struct notifier_block 
>>> *nfb, unsigned long action,
>>>              */
>>>
>>>     case CPU_ONLINE:
>>> -   case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
>>>             cpuset_update_active_cpus(true);
>>>             break;
>>>     default:
>>> @@ -7013,8 +6989,32 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_active(struct notifier_block 
>>> *nfb, unsigned long action,
>>> static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long 
>>> action,
>>>                            void *hcpu)
>>> {
>>> -   switch (action) {
>>> +   unsigned long flags;
>>> +   long cpu = (long)hcpu;
>>> +   struct dl_bw *dl_b;
>>> +
>>> +   switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
>>>     case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
>>> +           /* explicitly allow suspend */
>>> +           if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
>>> +                   bool overflow;
>>> +                   int cpus;
>>> +
>>> +                   rcu_read_lock_sched();
>>> +                   dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
>>> +
>>> +                   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
>>> +                   cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
>>> +                   overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
>>> +                   raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +                   rcu_read_unlock_sched();
>>> +
>>> +                   if (overflow) {
>>> +                           trace_printk("hotplug failed for cpu %lu", cpu);
>>> +                           return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
>>> +                   }
>>> +           }
>>>             cpuset_update_active_cpus(false);
>>>             break;
>>>     case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
>>> -- 
>>> 2.3.0
>> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to