On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:12:59PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Bug 93911 reported a broken handling of the BT device, causing the
> driver to get stuck in a loop enabling/disabling the device whenever
> the device is deactivated by the kill switch as follows:
>
> 1. The user activated the kill switch, causing the system to generate
> a 0x90 (status change) event and disabling the BT device.
> 2. The driver catches the event and re-enables the BT device.
It does? The toshiba_bluetooth_enable() call is supposed to exit silently if
BTST is not on. Is this check not working on some systems?
> 3. The system detects the device being activated, but since the kill
> switch is activated, disables the BT device (again) and generates
> a 0x90 event (again).
> 4. Repeat from 2.
>
> This patch removes the toshiba_bluetooth_enable call from the
> toshiba_bluetooth_notify function, as we do not always need to
> re-activate the device everytime we receive an event, we need to act
> depending on the status of the BT device.
>
> For now, we simply print the event received and the status of the BT
> device, so we can later add code to handle special circumstances
> depending on the status of the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscef...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_bluetooth.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_bluetooth.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_bluetooth.c
> index 0343d20..07edded 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_bluetooth.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_bluetooth.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> * Toshiba Bluetooth Enable Driver
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2009 Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@gmail.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Azael Avalos <coproscef...@gmail.com>
> *
> * Thanks to Matthew Garrett for background info on ACPI innards which
> * normal people aren't meant to understand :-)
> @@ -25,6 +26,10 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> +#define BT_KILLSWITCH_MASK 0x01
> +#define BT_PLUGGED_MASK 0x40
> +#define BT_POWER_MASK 0x80
> +
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@gmail.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Toshiba Laptop ACPI Bluetooth Enable Driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> @@ -135,7 +140,20 @@ static int toshiba_bluetooth_disable(acpi_handle handle)
>
> static void toshiba_bt_rfkill_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> {
> - toshiba_bluetooth_enable(device->handle);
> + int status;
> +
> + pr_info("Received event %x\n", event);
> +
> + /* Query the status of the Bluetooth device */
> + status = toshiba_bluetooth_status(device->handle);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + pr_info("Switch status %x\n", status & BT_KILLSWITCH_MASK);
> + pr_info("Power status %x\n", status & BT_POWER_MASK);
> + pr_info("Plug status %x\n", status & BT_PLUGGED_MASK);
This seems a bit noisy for the info level as this information seems more aimed
at a developer working to complete the TODO below... debug seems more
appropriate.
> +
> + /* TODO: Add event handling here depending on Bluetooth status */
Before if the RFKILL was disabled, this would have called
toshiba_bluetooth_enable() which would have checked BTST, found it on, and
enabled the device. In addition to killing the call to
toshiba_bluetooth_enable() when RFKILL is on, this also removes the call when
it's switched off.
I think I'm missing a path. Where does enable occur when the user turns the
radio back on now?
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> --
> 2.2.2
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
