3.13.11-ckt18 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Calvin Owens <[email protected]> commit 28423ad283d5348793b0c45cc9b1af058e776fd6 upstream. While debugging an issue with excessive softirq usage, I encountered the following note in commit 3e339b5dae24a706 ("softirq: Use hotplug thread infrastructure"): [ paulmck: Call rcu_note_context_switch() with interrupts enabled. ] ...but despite this note, the patch still calls RCU with IRQs disabled. This seemingly innocuous change caused a significant regression in softirq CPU usage on the sending side of a large TCP transfer (~1 GB/s): when introducing 0.01% packet loss, the softirq usage would jump to around 25%, spiking as high as 50%. Before the change, the usage would never exceed 5%. Moving the call to rcu_note_context_switch() after the cond_sched() call, as it was originally before the hotplug patch, completely eliminated this problem. Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> [ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ] Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> --- kernel/softirq.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index 11025cc..824a7ff 100644 --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -654,9 +654,13 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu) * in the task stack here. */ __do_softirq(); - rcu_note_context_switch(cpu); local_irq_enable(); cond_resched(); + + preempt_disable(); + rcu_note_context_switch(cpu); + preempt_enable(); + return; } local_irq_enable(); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
