On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:07:03 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> wrote:

> > -           .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> > +           .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)
> > +           | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> >     },  
> These cases strike me as problematic.  You should not need both.  If
> the consumer is reading _raw from a channel that only supplies
> PROCESSED then that is the bug, not the lack of support for a raw
> read.
> >  };
Very sorry about the delay, you are right that we should just need RAW.
V2 patch just sent.

Thanks,

Jacob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to