On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:05:05AM +0100, Howard Chen wrote:
> This patch adds an idle-states node to describe the mt8173 idle states and
> also adds references to the idle-states node in all CPU nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Howard Chen <howard.c...@linaro.org>

Is copying me in too much effort to ask ?

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> index 8554ec3..0d31a34 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
>                       device_type = "cpu";
>                       compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>                       reg = <0x000>;
> +                     enable-method = "psci";
> +                     cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;

Cluster idle state vanished between v1 and v2.

?

>               };
>  
>               cpu1: cpu@1 {
> @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
>                       compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>                       reg = <0x001>;
>                       enable-method = "psci";
> +                     cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>               };
>  
>               cpu2: cpu@100 {
> @@ -62,6 +65,7 @@
>                       compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
>                       reg = <0x100>;
>                       enable-method = "psci";
> +                     cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>               };
>  
>               cpu3: cpu@101 {
> @@ -69,6 +73,19 @@
>                       compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
>                       reg = <0x101>;
>                       enable-method = "psci";
> +                     cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> +             };
> +
> +             idle-states {
> +                     entry-method = "arm,psci";
> +
> +                     CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0 {
> +                             compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> +                             arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
> +                             entry-latency-us = <639>;
> +                             exit-latency-us = <328>;
> +                             min-residency-us = <1088>;
> +                     };
>               };
>       };

Is the arch timer still running when you enter this state ?

Apart from these remarks the patch seems fine, I wonder whether we should
merge these changes into the kernel instead of keeping these changes in
firmware for specific kernel configurations.

Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to