4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>

[ Upstream commit 4c0ee414e877b899f7fc80aafb98d9425c02797f ]

This patch reverts commit b8fb4e0648a2ab3734140342002f68fb0c7d1602
because the secmark must be preserved even when a packet crosses
namespace boundaries.  The reason is that security labels apply to
the system as a whole and is not per-namespace.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -4178,7 +4178,6 @@ void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *sk
        skb_dst_drop(skb);
        skb->mark = 0;
        skb_sender_cpu_clear(skb);
-       skb_init_secmark(skb);
        secpath_reset(skb);
        nf_reset(skb);
        nf_reset_trace(skb);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to