On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:35:00PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it > >>very impractical for other software components licensed under another > >>license. > >> > >>In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, > >>relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. > >> > [...] > >>so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please send > >>your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the > >>relicensing. > > > >I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes > >as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ?
Re-Acked-by: Jason Cooper <[email protected]> thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
