On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 11:55 +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > On 13/04/15 13:41, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote: > >>> Currently in validate_group(), there is a static initializer > >>> for fake_pmu.used_mask which is based on CPU_BITS_NONE but > >>> the used_mask array size is based on CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS. > >>> CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS is not based on NR_CPUS, so CPU_BITS_NONE > >>> is not correct and will cause a build failure if NR_CPUS > >>> is set high enough to make CPU_BITS_NONE larger than used_mask. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <[email protected]> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> > >> > >> Arnd, Olof, are you happy to take this via arm-soc? > >> > >> My (broken) patch went via Will's tree because of a perf dependency, but > >> other CCI patches have gone via you guys. > > > > Yeah, arm-soc is the best place for this. You should resend to > > [email protected] as a new patch with the relevant acks. > Mark > > Could you please send this to arm-soc as suggested by Will, with the > relevant acks/reviews ? >
I sent it on Tuesday. Did it not show up? Is [email protected] the correct address? I got the cc: From: Mark Salter <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group() Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:09:32 -0400 Message-Id: <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
