On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 15:38 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:03:07PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:33 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > Could you please send this to arm-soc as suggested by Will, with the > > > > > relevant acks/reviews ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I sent it on Tuesday. Did it not show up? Is [email protected] the correct > > > > address? I got the cc: > > > > > > > > From: Mark Salter <[email protected]> > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group() > > > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:09:32 -0400 > > > > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > > > > > > That's the right address, but that only goes to the maintainers, and > > > doesn't get copied to any list. In future, please Cc linux-arm-kernel in > > > addition. > > > > That's where I sent it originally. > > Sure, but it's good to Cc when sending to arm-soc so as to make it > visible that the patches have been sent. Doing so avoids the necessity > of queries like Suzuki's, and makes it possible for others to reply to > the version sent to [email protected] in the case of conflicts or other > issues.
But why did it need to be sent to a private maintainer's list in the first place? I think that the destination addresses of the original posting was perfectly reasonable given output from get_maintainer.pl and that sending me to a private list was an unnecessary hoop to jump through. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
