On 4/30/15 3:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan
<aravind.gopalakrish...@amd.com> wrote:
Changes introduced in the patch-
- Assign vector number 0xf4 for Deferred errors
- Declare deferred_interrupt, allocate gate and bind it
to DEFERRED_APIC_VECTOR.
- Declare smp_deferred_interrupt to be used as the
entry point for the interrupt in mce_amd.c
- Define trace_deferred_interrupt for tracing
- Enable deferred error interrupt selectively upon detection
of 'succor' bitfield
- Setup amd_deferred_error_interrupt() to handle the interrupt
and assign it to def_int_vector if feature is present in HW.
Else, let default handler deal with it.
- Provide Deferred error interrupt stats on
/proc/interrupts by incrementing irq_deferred_count
You're calling these "deferred interrupts" all over (e.g.
irq_deferred_count, deferred_int_handler, etc). That seems like it'll
be confusing. They're deferred errors, not deferred interrupts.
I used the term as it is an interrupt due to the deferred error.
Would 'deferred_err_interrupt' be more apt? Maybe
'irq_deferred_error_count' for the counter?
Thanks,
-Aravind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
