On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:16:30PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> I used the term as it is an interrupt due to the deferred error.
> Would 'deferred_err_interrupt' be more apt? Maybe 'irq_deferred_error_count'
> for the counter?
Yeah, I think it is important to stick to the "deferred error" naming
as those are interrupts announcing deferred errors and not deferred
interrupts.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
