On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:38:13AM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:

> +     /* Wait for interrupt indicating transfer is complete. */
> +     if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&mspi->xfer_done,
> +             msecs_to_jiffies(10))) {

What if we have a large transfer on a slow bus?

> +     while (bytes_processed < transfer->len) {

> +             /* Start transfer and wait until complete. */
> +             err = bcm_mspi_start_transfer(mspi, !last_slot, slot);
> +             if (err)
> +                     return err;

This isn't really start_transfer() is it?  It's doing the entire
operation.

> +             /* Delay requested amount before next transfer. */
> +             udelay(transfer->delay_usecs);
> +     }

This is buggy, it's applying the per-transfer delay every timme we fill
the FIFO.

> +     /* The rx data will go into RXRAM0/1 + last tx length. */
> +     if (slot + 1 >= NUM_SLOTS)
> +             mspi->rx_slot = 0;
> +     else
> +             mspi->rx_slot = slot + 1;

How is this going to work for full duplex transfers if we had to fill
the FIFO more than once?

> +static int bcm_mspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
> +     struct spi_device *spidev, struct spi_transfer *transfer)
> +{
> +     int err;
> +
> +     /* 8 bit transfers only are currently supported. */
> +     if (transfer->bits_per_word > 8)
> +             return -ENOTSUPP;

Tell the core what the device supports and it will check for you.

> +
> +     err = bcm_mspi_tx_data(master, spidev, transfer);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     err = bcm_mspi_rx_data(master, spidev, transfer);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

I would expect the recieve and transmit operations to be running in
parallel, not executed one after another, given the need to keep
manually filling and draining the FIFOs.

> +     struct spi_master *master;
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     int err;
> +     struct resource *res;
> +     unsigned int irq;
> +
> +     dev_info(dev, "Initializing BCM MSPI\n");

Don't spam the logs like this, there's no content in this message.

> +     master = spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(*data));
> +     if (!master) {

devm_spi_alloc_master().

> +     /* Map base memory address. */
> +     res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +     data->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +     if (IS_ERR(data->base)) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to map base address\n");

devm_ioremap_resource() will complain for you.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to