On 05/11, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Mike, Stephen, > > On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 05:03:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > of_io_request_and map returns an error pointer, but the current code assumes > > that on error the returned pointer will be NULL. > > > > Obviously, that makes the check completely useless. Change the test to > > actually > > check for the proper error code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> > > Cc: Mike Turquette <[email protected]> > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > There doesn't seem to be a sub-maintainer for that driver, I guess it > should go through your tree? >
Yep. Applied to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
