On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:34:47 +0000 Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com> wrote:
> The patch 1-13 backport the "seq_buf" infrastructures. in detail, patch 1, 2 > and 6 only backport "seq_buf" related code. > Ah, so basically you just backported the seq_buf.c code without modifying the trace_seq code. That's a good approach. I don't have much time to look at these but I'll try to skim them to see if I find anything broken. I may pull all of them into a test branch and run my tests to make sure they don't break anything else. -- Steve > arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 86 +++++++++- > include/linux/percpu.h | 4 + > include/linux/printk.h | 2 + > include/linux/seq_buf.h | 136 ++++++++++++++++ > kernel/printk.c | 41 +++-- > lib/Makefile | 2 +- > lib/seq_buf.c | 359 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 7 files changed, 617 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/seq_buf.h > create mode 100644 lib/seq_buf.c > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
