On Wed, 20 May 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Ingo suggested [1] to keep CLOCK_EVT_STATE_* symbols somewhere in
> kernel/time/. We couldn't do it as bL_switcher code was using it
> earlier. But that's fixed now. And so the first patch moves these
> symbols to tick-internal.h.
> 
> Some of the drivers [2] need to verify state of the clockevent device
> from their callbacks or interrupt handlers.

They look at clock_event_mode and not at state, right?
 
> Because these symbols (defined by 'enum clock_event_state') will now be
> internal to the core, we need some helpers to verify state of a
> clockevent device.

So how are they affected by moving clock_event_state to the core code ?
 
> One way out was to maintain the state in drivers as well, but that would
> be unnecessary burden on them. And so the second patch introduces
> helpers for these states.

And that way we add the overhead of a full function call to those
drivers for the interrupt hot path?

I just looked at the drivers and there are three classes of mode
checks and CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ usage:

1) Interrupt handler:

   Act depending on the mode:

          - disable the device in case of oneshot

            vf_pit_timer
            timer-atlas7
            sh_cmt
            sh_tmu
            rockchip_timer
            qcom-timer
            fsl_ftm_timer
            cs5535-clockevt
            arm_global_timer
            evt-sb1250
            cevt-bcm1480
            mips/jz4740
            dc21285-timer
            arc/time
            alpha/time

          - conditionally handle the device in case of shared
            interrupt hardware with trainwreck design or other
            shortcomings of the timer hardware

            timer-atmel-pit
            cs5535-clockevt
            x86/apic

2) Sensible checks:

   i8253                        init_pit_timer()
   x86/i8253                    init_pit_clocksource()
   cs5535_mfgpt                 init_mfgpt_timer()
   avr32/time                   comparator_mode()

3) Use cases which can be fixed by conversion to the seperate mode
   setters

   x86/apic                     Calibration code

4) Simple to fix stuff

   nios2                        nios2_timer_config()
   exynos_mct                   exynos4_mct_comp0_start()
   tcb_clksrc                   tc_mode()

5) Set mode from driver code:

   time-armada-370-xp           armada_370_xp_timer_stop()
   qcom-timer                   msm_local_timer_stop()
   exynos_mct                   exynos4_local_timer_stop()
   arm_global_timer             gt_clockevents_stop()
   arm_arch_timer               arch_timer_stop()
   smp_twd                      twd_timer_stop()
   hyperv/hv                    hv_synic_cleanup()

6) Random nonsense:

   xen/time                     xen_timerop_set_next_event()
                                xen_vcpuop_set_next_event()
   hyper/hv                     hv_ce_set_next_event()
   sh_cmt                       sh_cmt_clock_event_next()
   sh_tmu                       sh_tmu_clock_event_next()
   arm/mach-imx/time            mxc_set_mode()
   arm/mach-imx/apit            epit_set_mode()
   mxs_timer                    mxs_set_mode()
                                                
That list is way more useful than a pastebin with random grep output,
which does not cover use cases which SET a mode from driver code and
does not cover local storage of modes.

Of course you should have done that analysis before posting some
random helper functions.

Lets look how useful these functions are for the various use cases

#1) Adds function call over head to the timer interrupt

    Hot path does matter and that function call is a regression. So
    that's a NONO

#2) The function call overhead does not matter much for these, but
    they could be simply fixed by using local or device storage as
    well.

#3) A non issue

#4) Trivial to fix

#5) Trivial to replace by the explicit setter functions, but we want
    to know WHY this is done in the first place

#6) Simple to remove random crappola.

    I already did the patches while analysing the code, so that will
    be gone soon.

Now explain me how your magic functions help. For most of the cases
they would be a performance regression. And for the rest they really
do not matter at all.

Brilliant stuff that.

Thanks,

        tglx








--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to