On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:54:14AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 07:10:57 PM Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> [150519 17:01]:
> > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 04:27:56 PM Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> [150519 16:07]:
> > > > > On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 12:41:06 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > This one looks really good. :-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If it doesn't depend on anything, I can apply it right away, so 
> > > > > > > please let me
> > > > > > > know.
> > > > 
> > > > Sure works for me, it just has a dependency to patch #1 in this
> > > > series ("[PATCH 1/5] PM / Runtime: Update last_busy in rpm_resume").
> > > 
> > > OK, I'll queue them both up for 4.2, then.
> > > 
> > > Please let me know if you need a special branch with them.
> > 
> > A separate branch would be nice so I can merge that in too.
> 
> OK
> 
> I added a new pm-wakeirq branch to linux-pm.git with these two patches and
> one other commit related to runtime PM (all based on 4.1-rc4).  This branch
> will not be rebased going forward.

Hopefully it's not too late to get my

Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>

in the patch. If it is, no problem :-)

cheers

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to