On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:56:34AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:

SNIP

> +                             obj->path);
> +             err = -EINVAL;
> +             goto errout;
> +     }
> +     ep = &obj->elf.ehdr;
> +
> +     if ((ep->e_type != ET_REL) || (ep->e_machine != 0)) {
> +             pr_warning("%s is not an eBPF object file\n",
> +                     obj->path);
> +             err = -EINVAL;
> +             goto errout;
> +     }
> +
>       return 0;
> +errout:
> +     bpf_obj_clear_elf(obj);
> +     return err;
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_object *bpf_open_object(const char *path)
> +{

another suggestion for the namespace.. Arnaldo forces us ;-)
to use the object name first plus '__(method name)' for
interface functions so that would be:

  bpf_object__open
  bpf_object__close

not sure we want to keep that standard in here though.. Arnaldo?

jirka


SNIP

> +void bpf_close_object(struct bpf_object *obj)
> +{
> +     if (!obj)
> +             return;
> +
> +     bpf_obj_clear_elf(obj);
> +
> +     if (obj->path)
> +             free(obj->path);
> +     free(obj);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.3.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to