On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:55PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Before the IOMMU user (VFIO) would take control over the IOMMU table
> belonging to a specific IOMMU group. This approach did not allow sharing
> tables between IOMMU groups attached to the same container.
> 
> This introduces a new IOMMU ownership flavour when the user can not
> just control the existing IOMMU table but remove/create tables on demand.
> If an IOMMU implements take/release_ownership() callbacks, this lets
> the user have full control over the IOMMU group. When the ownership
> is taken, the platform code removes all the windows so the caller must
> create them.
> Before returning the ownership back to the platform code, VFIO
> unprograms and removes all the tables it created.
> 
> This changes IODA2's onwership handler to remove the existing table
> rather than manipulating with the existing one. From now on,
> iommu_take_ownership() and iommu_release_ownership() are only called
> from the vfio_iommu_spapr_tce driver.
> 
> Old-style ownership is still supported allowing VFIO to run on older
> P5IOC2 and IODA IO controllers.
> 
> No change in userspace-visible behaviour is expected. Since it recreates
> TCE tables on each ownership change, related kernel traces will appear
> more often.
> 
> This adds a pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_default_config() which is called
> when PE is being configured at boot time and when the ownership is
> passed from VFIO to the platform code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> [aw: for the vfio related changes]
> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: pgpwDQDCyXQYn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to