On Fri 2015-06-05 08:07:38, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2015-06-04 11:36:48, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Instead of a two individual printks that would generally be
> > > emitted on a single line, emit 2 lines to make the start
> > > and end of the synchronization more easily timeable.
> []
> > > diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c
> []
> > > @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > > unsigned int cmd,
> > > if (data->frozen)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > - printk("Syncing filesystems ... ");
> > > + printk("Syncing filesystems ...\n");
> > > sys_sync();
> > > - printk("done.\n");
> > > + printk("Syncing filesystems: done\n");
> >
> > You converted " ..." -> "..." elsewhere, so why not here?
>
> Missed that one.
>
> > Is splitting message to two lines a good idea?
>
> I think the "done" is unnecessary actually.
Well... if it is not neccessary for timing, this change can be safely
dropped, as timing will be provided for existing code, too.
> As there's no newline on the first, printk is
> async and can be interleaved by other threads.
...which will probably never happen here, due to feezer.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
