On 29/06/15 14:12, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Missing switch break since introduction of new event: > c4937a91ea56 perf tools: handle PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES > > Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > --- > tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > index 4744673aff1b..a08e38339cac 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ int machine__process_event(struct machine *machine, > union perf_event *event, > case PERF_RECORD_AUX: > ret = machine__process_aux_event(machine, event); break; > case PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START: > - ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event); > + ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event); > break; > case PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES: > ret = machine__process_lost_samples_event(machine, event, > sample); break; > break;
But now you have break; break; Isn't putting 'break' on the end of the line making things harder to read? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
