On Thu, 14 May 2015, Sasha Levin wrote:

> diff --git a/include/linux/mmdebug.h b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> index 202ebdf..8b3f5a0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ struct page;
>  struct vm_area_struct;
>  struct mm_struct;
>  
> -extern void dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason);
> -extern void dump_page_badflags(struct page *page, const char *reason,
> -                            unsigned long badflags);
> +char *format_page(struct page *page, char *buf, char *end);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>  char *format_vma(const struct vm_area_struct *vma, char *buf, char *end);
> @@ -18,7 +16,7 @@ char *format_mm(const struct mm_struct *mm, char *buf, char 
> *end);
>  #define VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(cond, page)                                   \
>       do {                                                            \
>               if (unlikely(cond)) {                                   \
> -                     dump_page(page, "VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(" 
> __stringify(cond)")");\
> +                     pr_emerg("%pZp", page);                         \
>                       BUG();                                          \
>               }                                                       \
>       } while (0)
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index 595bf50..1f045ae 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ char *mm_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
>       switch (fmt[1]) {
>       case 'm':
>               return format_mm(ptr, buf, end);
> +     case 'p':
> +             return format_page(ptr, buf, end);
>       case 'v':
>               return format_vma(ptr, buf, end);
>       default:
> @@ -1482,9 +1484,10 @@ int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
>   *        (legacy clock framework) of the clock
>   * - 'Cr' For a clock, it prints the current rate of the clock
>   * - 'T' task_struct->comm
> - * - 'Z[mv]' Outputs a readable version of a type of memory management 
> struct:
> + * - 'Z[mpv]' Outputs a readable version of a type of memory management 
> struct:
>   *           v struct vm_area_struct
>   *           m struct mm_struct
> + *           p struct page
>   *
>   * Note: The difference between 'S' and 'F' is that on ia64 and ppc64
>   * function pointers are really function descriptors, which contain a
> diff --git a/mm/balloon_compaction.c b/mm/balloon_compaction.c
> index fcad832..88b3cae 100644
> --- a/mm/balloon_compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/balloon_compaction.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ void balloon_page_putback(struct page *page)
>               put_page(page);
>       } else {
>               WARN_ON(1);
> -             dump_page(page, "not movable balloon page");
> +             pr_alert("Not movable balloon page:\n%pZp", page);
>       }
>       unlock_page(page);
>  }

I don't know how others feel, but this looks strange to me and seems like 
it's only a result of how we must now dump page information 
(dump_page(page) is no longer available, we must do pr_alert("%pZp", 
page)).

Since we're relying on print formats, this would arguably be better as

        pr_alert("Not movable balloon page:\n");
        pr_alert("%pZp", page);

to avoid introducing newlines into potentially lengthy messages that need 
a specified loglevel like you've done above.

But that's not much different than the existing dump_page() 
implementation.

So for this to be worth it, it seems like we'd need a compelling usecase 
for something like pr_alert("%pZp %pZv", page, vma) and I'm not sure we're 
ever actually going to see that.  I would argue that

        dump_page(page);
        dump_vma(vma);

would be simpler in such circumstances.

I do understand the problem with the current VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() and 
VM_BUG_ON_VMA() stuff, and it compels me to ask about just going back to 
the normal

        VM_BUG_ON(cond);

coupled with dump_page(), dump_vma(), dump_whatever().  It all seems so 
much simpler to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to