On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Prepare the pmem driver to consume PMEM namespaces emitted by regions of
>>>> an nvdimm_bus instance.  No functional change.
>>>
>>> As LIBNVDIMM depends on PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, the driver can no
>>> longer be enabled on pure 32-bit platforms. Is that intended?
>>
>> Yes it was intentional.  It still allows 32-bit platforms with 64-bit
>> resource_size_t to compile. Do you otherwise have a 32-bit use case
>> for pmem?  I'm of course open to working through the changes to add
>> wider architecture support.
>
> Nope, just wondering, as the original didn't depend on PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT.

Not explicitly, but it did rely on X86_PMEM_LEGACY.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to