On 7/6/15 18:31, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:49:20 +0800, Chen Gang said: >> On 07/06/2015 02:25 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:07:54 +0800, Chen Gang said: >>>> For upstream cris toolchain (gcc is 6.0 >>> >>> typo? >>> >> >> Do you mean "toolchain" -> "tool chain"? > > No, I was wondering where a gcc 6.0 managed to escape when 5.1 just got > released about 2 weeks ago.... >
OK, thanks. At present, gcc 6.0 is the latest in master branch. After check fedora released toolchain (gcc 4.9.1, binutils 2.25), it has no issue (support static variable in our case). So this patch can be dropped, and I shall try: - Use the same configuration parameters of fedora released toolchain to build the upstream latest cross toolchain again, and try. - If it still has issue (not support static variable), I shall try to fix it. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
