> -----Original Message----- > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:22 PM > To: Wu, Feng; Eric Auger; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding > control > > > > On 07/07/2015 13:18, Wu, Feng wrote: > > Then I still need assign prod and de-assign prod in > > irq_bypass_register_consumer/irq_bypass_unregister_consumer, Right? > > Would you please share why this is better. > > The need to store the consumer->producer link seems to be unique to > posted interrupts. It is difficult to say without seeing the PI code, > but I prefer to keep the bypass manager as small as possible.
Fine. I will follow your suggestion! Thanks, Feng > > Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
