The patch regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table initialisation
has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From f9178dad67952673b653315f92620b7a981466e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:58:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table initialisation Take this out of the main .probe() routine in order to facilitate the introduction of different ways to obtain 'duty cycle' information. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> --- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index ffa9612..25560fc 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, return drvdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].uV; } - -static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_ops = { +static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_table_ops = { .set_voltage_sel = pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel, .get_voltage_sel = pwm_regulator_get_voltage_sel, .list_voltage = pwm_regulator_list_voltage, @@ -88,20 +87,55 @@ static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_ops = { static struct regulator_desc pwm_regulator_desc = { .name = "pwm-regulator", - .ops = &pwm_regulator_voltage_ops, .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, .owner = THIS_MODULE, .supply_name = "pwm", }; +static int pwm_regulator_init_table(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata) +{ + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct pwm_voltages *duty_cycle_table; + int length; + int ret; + + of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", &length); + + if ((length < sizeof(*duty_cycle_table)) || + (length % sizeof(*duty_cycle_table))) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, + "voltage-table length(%d) is invalid\n", + length); + return -EINVAL; + } + + duty_cycle_table = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, length, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!duty_cycle_table) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "voltage-table", + (u32 *)duty_cycle_table, + length / sizeof(u32)); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read voltage-table\n"); + return ret; + } + + drvdata->duty_cycle_table = duty_cycle_table; + pwm_regulator_desc.ops = &pwm_regulator_voltage_table_ops; + pwm_regulator_desc.n_voltages = length / sizeof(*duty_cycle_table); + + return 0; +} + static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata; - struct property *prop; struct regulator_dev *regulator; struct regulator_config config = { }; struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; - int length, ret; + int ret; if (!np) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device Tree node missing\n"); @@ -112,36 +146,15 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!drvdata) return -ENOMEM; - /* determine the number of voltage-table */ - prop = of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", &length); - if (!prop) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No voltage-table\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - if ((length < sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table)) || - (length % sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table))) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "voltage-table length(%d) is invalid\n", - length); + if (of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", NULL)) { + ret = pwm_regulator_init_table(pdev, drvdata); + if (ret) + return ret; + } else { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No \"voltage-table\" supplied\n"); return -EINVAL; } - pwm_regulator_desc.n_voltages = length / sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table); - - drvdata->duty_cycle_table = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, - length, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!drvdata->duty_cycle_table) - return -ENOMEM; - - /* read voltage table from DT property */ - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "voltage-table", - (u32 *)drvdata->duty_cycle_table, - length / sizeof(u32)); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "read voltage-table failed\n"); - return ret; - } - config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, np, &pwm_regulator_desc); if (!config.init_data) -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
