On 07/14/2015 11:39 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 17:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
There's a buglet,
We'll not look for a idle cpu when wake_wide() naks want_affine.
*sigh* indeed.. fixing that'll bring us very close to what we started
out wiht..
The one XXX there raises the question on whether we should always so
select_idle_sibling() if we do not have a suitable balance flag, or only
on wakeups.
That's what I've been sitting here waffling over, finally convinced
myself that should the user turn FORX/EXEC off, he shouldn't find that a
substitute quietly slipped in.. though otoh.. crap, guess I'm not done
waffling after all. Yeah, this will work just fine ;-)
(typos fixed)
We happy with this or should I wait for more patches to fly by before I
test something ;)?
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
