On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:

> security_settime() returns a timespec, which is not year 2038 safe

It returns int, which is year 2038 safe on all systems. Copy and paste
is great, right?

> -int security_settime(const struct timespec *ts, const struct timezone *tz);
> +int security_settime64(const struct timespec64 *ts, const struct timezone 
> *tz);
> +static inline int security_settime(const struct timespec *ts, const struct 
> timezone *tz)
> +{
> +     struct timespec64 ts64 = timespec_to_timespec64(*ts);
> +
> +     return security_settime64(&ts64, tz);
> +}

What's the point of this inline? Explanation is missing in
changelog.

Also this wants follow up patches which fix the call sites and remove
that inline helper again.

> -int cap_settime(const struct timespec *ts, const struct timezone *tz)
> +int cap_settime(const struct timespec64 *ts, const struct timezone *tz)

Changelog is missing that none of the existing hooks is using the ts
argument and therefor the patch is not doing any functional changes.

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to