On July 15, 2015 12:26:40 AM EDT, Juergen Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >On 07/10/2015 03:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory. >>> >>> Following test have been done: >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 1TB machine (resolving p2m/E820-map conflict) >>> - 32 bit dom0 on 8GB machine >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked kernel/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked pgtable/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked initrd/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked p2m/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit domU (sizes up to 900GB) >>> - 32 bit domU >> >> Woot! >> >> Thank you for doing that. I noticed that you used the 'normal' >> sizes, but nothing as odd as '3145M' or such to try to break >> things. Not sure if it is worht it - as the test suite that >> Boris runs does run with some odd sizes to catch this. > >How did you notice the domU sizes from these lines? :-)
Intuition :-) > >I tested with sizes being power of 2 as well as other values (e.g. >100000 MB). > >> I only had one comment about the #13 patch, otherwise I think >> we are OK with this patchset? > >Can I take this as an "Acked-by" for the other patches? Yes! > > >Juergen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
