On (06/20/15 18:25), Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On (06/17/15 16:14), David Rientjes wrote:
> > [..]
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
> > > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583
> > >
> > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > kmem_cache_destroy() isn't a fastpath, this is long overdue. Now where's
> > > the patch to remove the NULL checks from the callers? ;)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Yes, Julia Lawall (Cc'd) already has a patch set ready for submission.
>
> The patch for making these functions able to tolerate NULL doesn't seem to
> be in linux-next yet, so I will wait until it appears.
Hello Julia,
The patches are in -next now.
mm/dmapool: 8bf49946ed8fa01a0b5e7d0de94655c072525344
mm/mempool: eb54bc8469e2977bcef4e284d24cbf3578ce9cd9
mm/slab_common: e88672f95907c14cf8ab2cce592c41bbb9cefc5f
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
