On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:56:31 +0900 Jungseok Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Recently, I've noticed that there is a minor, not logical, flaw in the > above hunk as reviewing patches which do not get any signals yet. It is > a lack of 's' in msec in comment. That is, my latest one is as follows. > > + MARK(100000000ULL , '@'), /* 100 msecs */ > + MARK(10000000ULL , '*'), /* 10 msecs */ > > I know it's definitely trivial, but I've updated it to align with other > comments and planned to resend the patch. Surprisingly, this patch > has been already staged on your repo. So, I leave a whole patch again > including your SOB since I don't know how to handle this. > > Thanks you for reviewing my patch! The original is in the process of going through my tests. I waited till rc3 to come out to rebase all my work on it (including this patch) and restated testing again. I tripped on some things that are still buggy in -rc3 (which delays the finishing of my testing). As it is in the testing phase, I wont be modifying it. If you want, just send another patch on top of my ftrace/core branch, and I can add that to my queue too. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
