On Jul 22, 2015, at 12:09 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:56:31 +0900 > Jungseok Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Recently, I've noticed that there is a minor, not logical, flaw in the >> above hunk as reviewing patches which do not get any signals yet. It is >> a lack of 's' in msec in comment. That is, my latest one is as follows. >> >> + MARK(100000000ULL , '@'), /* 100 msecs */ >> + MARK(10000000ULL , '*'), /* 10 msecs */ >> >> I know it's definitely trivial, but I've updated it to align with other >> comments and planned to resend the patch. Surprisingly, this patch >> has been already staged on your repo. So, I leave a whole patch again >> including your SOB since I don't know how to handle this. >> >> Thanks you for reviewing my patch! > > The original is in the process of going through my tests. I waited till > rc3 to come out to rebase all my work on it (including this patch) and > restated testing again. I tripped on some things that are still buggy > in -rc3 (which delays the finishing of my testing). > > As it is in the testing phase, I wont be modifying it. If you want, > just send another patch on top of my ftrace/core branch, and I can add > that to my queue too.
Thanks for a kind explanation. I think it is not needed to create another patch for only this change. Best Regards Jungseok Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
