于 2015/7/24 6:56, Alexei Starovoitov 写道:
> On 7/23/15 2:42 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
>> According to the perf_event_map_fd and index, the function
>> bpf_perf_event_read() can convert the corresponding map
>> value to the pointer to struct perf_event and return the
>> Hardware PMU counter value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <xiaka...@huawei.com>
> ...
>> +static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
>> +{
>> +    struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
>> +    struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
>> +    struct perf_event *event;
>> +
>> +    if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
>> +        return -E2BIG;
>> +
>> +    event = array->events[index];
>> +    if (!event)
>> +        return -EBADF;
> 
> probably ENOENT makes more sense here.
> 
>> +
>> +    if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
>> +        return -ENOENT;
> 
> and -EINVAL here?

Yeah, the errno is better.

Thanks!
> 
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to