On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> From: Xunlei Pang <[email protected]>
>
> The weak update_persistent_clock64() calls update_persistent_clock(),
> if the architecture defines a update_persistent_clock64() to replace
> and remove its update_persistent_clock() version, the compiler will
s/compiler/linker/ right?
> throw an undefined symbol error, that is, any arch that switches to
> update_persistent_clock64() will have this issue.
>
> So, we should add the common weak update_persistent_clock().
Are we adding it or should we add it?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
