On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 05:11:13PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:31AM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > > > > SNIP > > > > > struct addr_location *al, > > > @@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct > > hists *hists, > > > struct branch_info *bi, > > > struct mem_info *mi, u64 period, > > > u64 weight, u64 transaction, > > > + struct freq_perf_info *freq_perf, > > > bool sample_self); > > > int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct > > addr_location *al, > > > int max_stack_depth, void *arg); > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.h b/tools/perf/util/sort.h index > > > e97cd47..90422ed 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.h > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.h > > > @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct he_stat { > > > u64 period_guest_us; > > > u64 weight; > > > u32 nr_events; > > > + u64 freq; > > > + u64 cpu_u; > > > > could the cpu_u have more descriptive name? > > How about "cpu_util" or "cpu_utilization"?
cpu_util sounds good to me thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
