Le 28/07/2015 07:03, Moritz Fischer a écrit : > Hi Michal, > > I agree we need to be careful with changing the bindings. > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Moritz, >> >> On 07/25/2015 02:21 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++- >> >> This patch is nice in general but every change in binding should be >> discussed separately. There is also necessary to wire them up in the >> driver to do action. That's why I think that will be the best just to >> add the code to slcr and keep others untouched. > > Ok, just to clarify: You'd suggest to just add the rstc as child node > to the slcr, > and leave the other nodes untouched? > >> >> For example MACB/GEM is one example. Adding names to this node and >> extending driver to work properly with reset means that all others MACB >> users will be affected. Definitely this patch should be ACKed by Nicolas.
Actually, I don't know why a reset property should be added to the macb driver... Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
