Dear Alexandre Belloni,

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:22:02 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

>  static int at91_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> -             ret = at91_reset_of_probe(pdev);
> -     else
> -             ret = at91_reset_platform_probe(pdev);
>  
> +     ret = at91_reset_of_probe(pdev);

Maybe it no longer makes sense to have separate at91_reset_probe() and
at91_reset_of_probe() functions then.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to