> IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
@ from include/linux/err.h
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
...
static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
{
return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
}
"!ptr" appears not covered with IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
(only the IS_ERR part seems covered)
Cheers,
MyungJoo
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
